Richard Rhodes III – Northeastern Regional Association of State Agricultural Experiment Station Directors
Leigh Hallett – United States Department of Agriculture
Zachary Schmesser – District Representative for Congressman Jared Golden
Edie Smith – Regional Representative for Senator Angus King
Carol Woodcock – State Office Representative to Senator Susan Collins
Amanda Beal – Maine Department of Agriculture, Conservation & Forestry (virtual)
Eric Venturini – Wild Blueberry Commission of Maine
Kevin Woltemath – Agricultural Council of Maine
Marge Kilkelly – Livestock Farmer other than dairy, BoA Chair
Stephanie Burnett – UMaine Faculty Representative
Philip Fanning – UMaine Faculty Representative
Sebastian Belle – Maine Aquaculture Representative
Ryan Dennet – Maine Organic Farmers and Gardeners Association (virtual)
Jeannie Tapley – Maine Potato Board (virtual)
Hannah Carter – UMaine Cooperative Extension
Jim Dill – UMaine Cooperative Extension, Maine State Representation
Jake Ward – UMaine Vice President for Innovation and Economic Development
John Volin – UMaine Provost
Kelly Sparks – UMaine Vice President for Finance and Chief Business Officer
Joan Ferrini-Mundy – UMaine President
Samantha Warren – UMS Director of Government & Community Relations (virtual)
Amber Lambke – UMaine President’s Appointee
Lee Hecker – Maine Agricultural and Forest Experiment Station, incoming BoA Clerk
George Criner – Maine Agricultural and Forest Experiment Station, outgoing BoA Clerk
Diane Rowland – Maine Agricultural and Forest Experiment Station
Introductions – Marge Kilkelly (10:00-10:10)
Welcome, introductions, handouts dispersed, and agenda review
University of Maine Budget Process Overview – President Joan Ferrini-Mundy and CBO Kelly Sparks (10:10-11:00)
Incoming undergraduate enrollment is up
Orono: F23 = 2,092 first year students; F24 = 2,541 first year students
Machias: F24 = 90 first year and transfer students
Reminder – UMaine’s budget is primarily dependent on tuition
Increased student numbers of a good indicator of increased tuition revenue for UM, but still need to determine actual credit hour enrollment
Major capital projects underway include improvements to Blueberry Hill Farm, new sawmill and classroom in DeMerrit Forest, and $3.5M dairy barn at Witter Farm ($1.2M of which came from UMaine’s E&G reserves)
Strategic Re-envisioning (SRE)
What do we want UMaine to be in five years?
Three phases: 1) Reflection & Re-envisioning (April – June 2024), 2) Prioritizing and Assessing (i.e., committees; July – September 2024), 3) Refining and Executing (October 2024 – February 2025)
Phase 2 – 13 working groups, Cooperative Extension (CES) has representation on 10
Phase 3 – End of September working groups should have 2-page summaries to share with larger groups (e.g., BoA) for their input.
UMaine budget update
UMaine is responsible for balancing its own budget.
Expenses outweigh revenues. Thus, UMaine uses reserves to balance annual budget but is reducing how much reserve is used annually.
FY25
Education and general (E&G) expense budget = $273.3M
Four primary sources of Revenue
State appropriations = $105.4M
Tuition and fees = $124.8M (net of financial aid)
Indirect cost returns on research grants = $22.2M
Other sales/service/auxiliary revenues = $16.0M
E&G match for MAFES and CES
MAFES = $5.1M
CES = $6.4M
Total = $11.5M (4.2% of E&G budget)
FY26 – First round of budget discussions is underway, but UMaine has not begun to build the FY26 budget.
Will be informed by SRE
Questions and comments
President Ferrini-Mundy recommends specific Zoom sessions to cover topics such as external funding and indirect cost revenues
How does BoA get input into the budget that goes to the governor?
Responses
Current requests are very high-level
Indicate general support for UMaine when governor releases budget
Ensure that when presenting budget, as many committees in Augusta can identify with what UMaine is asking
The board wants to provide support for UMaine, but only with evidence that UMaine supports MAFES & CES
Maine Agricultural and Forest Experiment Station (MAFES) Budget Overview – Dean/Director Diane Rowland (11:00 – 12:00)
MAFES budget is partially connected to the budget of the College of Earth, Life & Health Sciences (ELH) through E&G and the Maine Economic Improvement Fund (MEIF)
Two components of MAFES budget: 1) Federal capacity funding (Animal Health, Hatch, Multi-state, McIntire Stennis); 2) State required match (E&G, MEIF)
FY19 – FY23 federal capacity grants covered on average 20% of MAFES expenses annually
MAFES expenses in 2023 (example year) by category: 74% faculty & staff salaries, 19% facility operations, 3% PI support & startup, 0.4% capital (infrastructure & equipment), and 5% other operating expenses
These data can be found on the publicly available AD-419.
Questions (in italics) from Board of Agriculture (BoA)
What are the facility needs of the Farms?
Repairs, replacement, and new facilities/equipment
How are those prioritized?
Needs are prioritized within each farm. Annually funding is dispersed to meet highest priority needs at each farm. Facilities & equipment needs are tracked, ranked, and carried over from year to year.
Priorities – Safety/code, research, teaching/student recruitment, energy saving, aesthetics.
How are ongoing and capital expenses allocated in Budgets? – Historically, MAFES used carry-forward, gift funds, and some annual capital funding, approved loans, and a banking model for direct-cost recovery for capital projects. This model has not kept up with infrastructure needs and will be more challenging in the coming years with the use of most carry-forward in FY24-25.
Are costs associated with the Farms divided among MAFES and CE? Is there a formula?
A direct cost recovery model is applied to MAAFES and CE for space use on farms. Service fees are set federally and applied to each farm. This revenue is a minor part of farm annual budgets.
How is research grant money attributed across faculty researchers and units?
UMaine allocates “credit” by PI, rather than by unit; that is decided at the time of proposal submission, by the proposal team. When totaling unit grant income, each unit counts contributions by faculty who are wholly or partially appointed in that unit. The Indirect Cost (IDC) for a grant is designed to cover facilities, library, admin, etc. and covers expenses such as university contracting, general counsel, financial reporting, etc. Starting in FY24, a portion will also be distributed to the PI and to the unit
MAFES faculty account for ~50% of ELH grants annually (FY20 – FY24)
ELH accounts for 28% – 43% (2019 – 2014) of UMaine doctorates conferred, a key component of maintaining R1 status
From 2023-2024 base funds, MAFES faculty produce $23M in grants, funding 119 masters and 101 doctoral students
State, federal, grants, tuition funds are the obvious revenue streams of the MAFES and CE. What are some of the other income sources and how can they be increased?
Current and potential income sources – Industry contracts, produce/timber sales, royalties, fee for service (e.g., analytical lab), direct cost recovery, carbon credits, gifts and fundraising, and timber sales (primarily for scholarships)
Congressional Directed Spending (CDS) is becoming more important and significant. How are decisions made about CDS spending requests? How can BOA have input into that process? How can the BOA help support ag related CDS requests?
Following a mid-October Call for Ideas, UMaine and UMS have an internal review for prioritization, then, in conversation with a consultant, they select projects to present to the delegation (~January).
BOA can engage with the Deans to propose ideas for review. BOA can receive relevant proposals and provide comments after submission.
Early conversations with the Deans and other UMaine leadership to develop ideas that will appeal to the delegation. Advocate through support letters for projects sent to the delegation.
Sustainable Wood to Fuel and Fish Feed, US Bioeconomy ($1.5M)
Tick-Borne Disease Prevention ($1.3M)
Note that the slide on major grants needed acknowledgment of participation from other colleges, including Earth, Life and Health Sciences, and Engineering.
Concerns
Unstable county funding
Inflationary pressures on both Federal Appropriations and match
Deferred maintenance on our facilities
Recruitment and retention of faculty and staff
The decreasing ability to address the needs of the state that we are uniquely positioned to respond to
Opportunities
Targeted grants across several programmatic areas
Alignment with University SRE initiatives/ideas
Partnerships with other entities across campus, the UMS, federal and state agencies, non-profits, etc. on new positions and new ways to address needs
Building on our reputational brand as a trusted source of research, information and education
Questions and comments
Are MAFES and CE allowed to dip into their within program reserves?
Yes, but it has to be planned (e.g., 3-years out).
Northeast Regional Association (NERA) of State Agricultural Experiment Station Directors: The Legacy and Future of the State Ag Experiment Station – Executive Director Rick Rhodes (1:45 – 2:15)
Overview of history and legislation associated with the formation of Experiment Stations and Cooperative Extension programs.
AgInnovation objectives:
“…promote the efficient production, marketing, distribution, and utilization of products of the farm…”
“…assure agriculture a position in research equal to that of industry…”
“…object and duty of the State agricultural experiment stations…to conduct original researches, investigations, and experiments bearing directly on and contributing to the establishment and maintenance of a permanent and effective agricultural industry…”
Overview of Experiment Station regions and branches
Roles of Experiment Stations: 1) research and innovation, 2) maintain closer relationship with CE, 3) education and training, and 4) address local, state, regional, and national needs.
Impact of Experiment Stations: 1) advancing agricultural practices, 2) policy and regulation (fed by science), 3) collaboration with industry, and 4) economic impact (every $1 invested in public agricultural research and development has historically generated $20 in value; USDA).
NERA roles – RSA for Hatch Multistate portfolio, information commons, “co-laboratory”, and representation
Land grant university funding sources and proportions have largely gone unchanged over the past decade
The United States has maintained a consistent level of investment into public agricultural research and development over the past 20 years. Other developed countries are increasing their investment.
Summary of regions’ State to Federal Match
North Central = 0.3 – 5x
Northeast = 0.2 – 3x
South = 3.5 – 17x
West = 0.6 – 11x
Recommendations
Educate faculty on Land-grant
AES appt: limited duration
Relationship building
Stakeholders/Policy makers
Active advocacy
Questions and comments
Is it normal for Experiment Station faculty to bounce between grants (e.g., Hatch to Multi-state)?
Yes
Do states with a higher ratio of matched funds have larger ag companies?
Yes
To-dos – Marge Kilkelly (2:15 – 2:30)
Start online seminar series conducting deeper dives into subjects such as indirect-costs, grants, centers/institutions, etc.
Get BoA input on SRE committee summaries
Coordinate BoA Zoom meeting (to be recorded) to do a deeper dive into UMS structure (research institutes vs. MAFES vs. CE vs. etc.)
New items – Marge Kilkelly (2:30 – 2:45)
BoA meetings fall under the Public Meeting Statute. Future meetings need to be planned accordingly (e.g., public notices, etc.).
BoA would like to hear from MAFES and CE staff via a survey.
January tradeshow – BoA would like to have a booth
Next meeting October 4 at Highmoor Farm, Monmouth, Maine
