{"id":946,"date":"2012-01-24T10:32:54","date_gmt":"2012-01-24T15:32:54","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/extension.umaine.edu\/plugged-in\/?page_id=946"},"modified":"2019-12-23T10:02:42","modified_gmt":"2019-12-23T15:02:42","slug":"procedures-for-review-of-extension-professional-promotion-packets","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/extension.umaine.edu\/plugged-in\/hr\/extension-professional-employees\/promotion-process\/procedures-for-review-of-extension-professional-promotion-packets\/","title":{"rendered":"Procedures for Review of Extension Professional Promotion Packets"},"content":{"rendered":"

Promotion packets are confidential documents and should be treated as such. Packet evaluations should not be discussed beyond EPPRC.<\/p>\n

    \n
  1. Meet to discuss the review process and evaluation criteria and create a shared understanding among current EPPRC members.<\/li>\n
  2. Each member reviews each packet and completes an evaluation. Plan on this taking one to two (1 – 2) hours per packet.<\/li>\n
  3. Meet to compare evaluations, and consolidate evaluation comments into one Word document (easiest to do this during conversation while all members present).<\/li>\n
  4. Discuss points for letters, general format of letters. Assign responsibility for writing letters to communicate EPPRC\u2019s recommendation to the Extension Director.<\/li>\n
  5. Each EPPRC member has to read and sign each letter.<\/li>\n
  6. Please provide feedback to EPC about the process for continued improvement.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n