2010-2013 Maine and Vermont Organic Spring Wheat Variety Trial Results

2010-2013 Maine and Vermont Organic Spring Wheat Variety Trial Results (PDF)

Ellen Mallory, Heather Darby, Thomas Molloy, and Erica Cummings

Bread wheat is a new crop option for farmers in New England due to increasing consumer demand for locally grown food. In 2010, the University of Maine and University of Vermont began a series of trials evaluating varieties of hard red wheat to identify those that perform well in Northern New England under organic production. This publication presents results for spring wheat varieties tested from 2010 through 2013. Separate publications of prior years’ full results for both spring and winter wheat variety trials are available online.

This collaborative work was funded by a grant from the USDA Organic Agriculture Research and Extension Initiative to improve bread wheat production in our region.

TRIAL DESIGN AND VARIETIES

Trials were established each year at four locations in Northern New England: Alburgh, VT; Old Town or Presque Isle, ME; Sidney, ME; and Willsboro, NY. The experimental design was a randomized complete block with four replications, which means that each variety was planted in four separate plots at each location. All of the varieties evaluated from 2010 to 2013 are listed in Table 1. Over the course of the trials, some varieties were added as new ones became available and some varieties were removed if they were found to be unsuitable for our region (ex., highly susceptible to Fusarium head blight) or for bread flour markets (ex., low grain protein levels). The results for varieties that were dropped from our trials can be found in previous years’ reports.

WEATHER CONDITIONS

Seasonal precipitation and temperature were recorded at or near the trial locations. The Alburgh, VT, Old Town, ME, Presque Isle, ME, and Willsboro, NY locations had weather stations in close proximity to the trial sites, while the Sidney, ME location had a weather station within 8 miles. Weather conditions varied greatly from year to year, affecting the overall development and quality of the wheat (Table 2).

In 2010, weather conditions were ideal for growing spring wheat. The spring was warm and dry, with April and May temperatures well above the 30-year mean and rainfall below normal, allowing for wheat to be planted up to two weeks earlier than what is normal for the region. Except for the month of June, the pattern of above average temperatures and below average rainfall continued through the growing season.

In 2011, weather conditions were more challenging for spring grains due to heavy spring precipitation, especially at the VT and NY sites where rainfall for both April and May was about 5 inches above normal. Planting was delayed at all sites, occurring from May 2 to May 13. Summer temperatures were slightly cooler than normal in ME and slightly warmer than usual at the VT and NY sites. Precipitation levels were normal or slightly below at all sites.

As in 2010, early spring conditions in 2012 were substantially warmer and somewhat drier than usual allowing for early planting (April 6 to April 13). The VT and NY locations also experienced above average temperatures during the middle and later part of the growing season. In ME, precipitation was above average in June prior to and during wheat flowering and conditions were warmer and drier than average during grain fill and harvest.

2013 started off drier than normal allowing for early planting at the VT and NY sites and timely planting in ME. Starting in late May through June, precipitation levels were well above normal. The VT and NY sites received two times the average rainfall for June. July precipitation levels returned to normal at all sites, however, above average levels occurred in August in ME during grain ripening and dry down.

CULTURAL PRACTICES

Trial plots were managed following practices similar to those used by farmers in New England (Table 3).

University of Maine Rogers and Smith Research Farms — Old Town, ME (2010 – 2012): As soon as weather conditions allowed, the plot areas were moldboard plowed. Prior to planting, solid dairy manure was applied and incorporated on the same day with a Perfecta harrow. The estimated total available nitrogen from the various fertility sources was 70 lbs per acre in 2010 and 2011 and 90 lbs per acre in 2012. The spring wheat varieties were planted using an Almaco cone seeder with 6.5-inch row spacing. The seeding rate was 30 live seeds per square foot in 2010 and 2012 and increased to 51 live seeds per square foot for 2012. These rates correspond to target plant populations of 1.3 and 2 million plants per acre, respectively. When the wheat reached the 3-leaf stage, the plots were tine harrowed with a 10-ft. Lely Weeder (spring tine harrow) if weed seedling numbers were high and field conditions allowed. In 2012, the plots were topdressed with Chilean nitrate at 100 lbs per acre (16 lbs of nitrogen per acre) when the wheat was in the late tillering stage. Wheat grain was harvested using a Wintersteiger Classic plot combine. Harvest area was 4’ x 33’.

University of Maine Presque Isle Research Farm — Presque Isle, ME (2013 only): The trial area was disk harrowed in early spring and then chicken manure from a broiler operation was spread. The manure was worked in with a Vibrashank seed-bed conditioner. The estimated total available nitrogen from the manure source was 60 lbs per acre. The spring wheat varieties were planted using an Almaco cone seeder with a 6.5 inch row spacing. The seeding rate was 51 live seeds per square foot, which corresponds to a target population of 2 million plants per acre. The plots were tine harrowed using a Lely Weeder when the wheat was at the 3-leaf stage. A Wintersteiger Classic plot combine was used to harvest the plots. Harvest area was 4’ x 33’.

Rainbow Valley Farm — Sidney, ME: Field preparation at this site was similar to the Old Town site except liquid dairy manure was used in 2010 and 2011, and manure incorporation and seedbed preparation were accomplished with two passes of a disc harrow followed by a pass of either a cultivator packer, a spring-tooth harrow, or a C-shank chisel harrow. The estimated total available nitrogen from the manure sources were 70 lbs per acre in 2010 and 2011, 55 lbs per acre in 2012, and 78 lbs per acre in 2013. Spring wheat was planted using an Almaco cone seeder with a 6.5 inch row spacing. The seeding rate was 30 live seeds per square foot in 2010 and 2012 and increased to 51 live seeds per square foot for 2012 and 2013. Weeds were managed with one pass of a LELY Weeder tine weeder in 2010 and 2012. A Wintersteiger Classic plot combine was used to harvest the plots. Harvest area was 4’ x 33’.

Borderview Research Farm — Alburgh, VT: For the 2010 and 2012 trials, the plot areas were plowed the prior fall to kill and incorporate a perennial forage stand, and in the spring, they were disked and spike-tooth harrowed before planting. The estimated nitrogen availability from the sod plow down was 65-75 lbs per acre. In 2011, the fertility source was poultry manure applied at a rate to supply an estimated 70 lbs per acre of available nitrogen. In 2013, no pre-plant fertility was applied following a prior corn crop. In 2011 and 2013, field preparation consisted of one pass each of a disk and a spike-tooth harrow. In all years, wheat was seeded using an eight-row Kincaid Cone Seeder with 6-inch row spacing at a rate of 33 live seeds per square foot, equivalent to a target population of 1.4 million plants per acre. When needed, plots were tine weeded with a 12 ft. Kovar Tine Weeder. Wheat was harvested using an Almaco SPC50 plot combine. Harvest area was 5’ x 20’.

Willsboro Research Farm — Willsboro, NY: The fields used for the 2010 and 2011 trials were fall plowed. In 2010, the field was dragged twice in the fall to eliminate remaining alfalfa and perennial grasses. In April of each year, the fields were disked and spike-tooth harrowed before planting. Estimated nitrogen availability from the various fertility sources was 65-75 lbs per acre. Wheat was seeded using a custom eight-row cone seeder with 6-inch row spacing at a rate of 33 live seeds per square foot. The plots were harvested with a Hege plot combine. Harvest area was 4’ x 13’.

MEASUREMENTS AND METHODS

Flowering date was recorded for each variety where possible. Plant heights were measured at each site at the peak biomass stage. Prior to harvest, the incidence and severity of lodging was noted for each variety. All varieties were harvested on the same day at each site once the latest maturing variety threshed free in hand tests and weather and logistics allowed. Following harvest, grain was cleaned with a small Clipper cleaner and weights were recorded. Harvest moisture and test weights were determined using DICKEY-john GAC-2100 grain moisture meters.

Subsamples were ground into flour using a Perten LM3100 Laboratory Mill. The ground material was then analyzed for crude protein, falling number, and mycotoxin levels. Protein content was determined using a Perten Inframatic 8600 Flour Analyzer. Most commercial mills target 12-14% protein. Falling number was determined on a Perten FN 1500 Falling Number Machine. The falling number is related to the level of sprout damage that has occurred in the grain due to enzymatic activity. It is measured as the time it takes, in seconds, for a plunger to fall through a slurry of flour and water to the bottom of the tube. Falling numbers less than 200 seconds indicate high enzymatic activity and poor quality wheat. Concentrations of deoxynivalenol (DON), a mycotoxin produced by the fungus that causes Fusarium head blight, were determined using the Veratox DON 2/3 Quantitative test from the NEOGEN Corp. This test has a detection range of 0.5 to 5 ppm. Samples with DON values greater than 1 ppm are considered unsuitable for human consumption.

Shaping the loaves.
Bakers conducting tests of flour at King Arthur Flour in Vermont. Photo by Erica Cummings.

Bake testing was conducted on eleven varieties from the 2012 growing season. Samples for testing came from individual field sites and were selected based on protein, DON, falling number levels and quantity of available grain. Each sample was milled at Gleason Grains in Bridport, VT on a Meadows Mills Inc. stone burr mill and then sifted on a Meadows Mills Inc. bolter which produced a finely ground flower with an approximate 86% extraction rate. The bake tests were conducted by: Randy George, Red Hen Baking Company, Duxbury, VT; Jeffery Hamelman, King Arthur Flour, Norwich, VT; and Alison Pray, Standard Baking Co., Portland, ME. Each baker followed the same recipe for a naturally leavened bread and as each sample was tested the bakers used a predetermined list of criteria to score for certain characteristics from the beginning of the baking process to the final loaf.

All data were analyzed using mixed model Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) in which replicates were considered random effects. The LSD procedure was used to detect whether differences among variety averages were statistically significant and was only conducted if the ANOVA F-test was significant (P<0.05) (see below for a description of a “significant difference”). There were significant differences between the locations for most parameters, so results from each location are reported independently.


What Is a Significant Difference?

Variations in yield and quality can occur not only due to genetics but also due to variability in soil, weather, and other growing conditions. Statistical analysis makes it possible to determine whether a difference between two varieties is real or whether it might have occurred due to other variability in the field. The Least Significant Difference (LSD) is the minimum difference needed between two averages to consider them statistically different. LSDs at the 5% level of probability are presented at the bottom of each table for each measure. Where the difference between two varieties within a column is equal to or greater than the LSD value, you can be sure in 19 out of 20 chances that there is a real difference between the two varieties.

In the example below, variety A is significantly different from variety C because the difference between their yields (1454) is greater than the LSD value (889). Variety A is not significantly different from variety B because the difference between their yields (725) is less than the LSD value (889).

Throughout this bulletin, the greatest value at each site for each measure is indicated with an underline and bold type. Varieties that are not significantly different from the greatest value are also in bold type. Using the example below, variety C had the highest measured yield (underlined and bolded) but it was not significantly different than the yield of variety B (bolded).

Example Table

Variety Yield
A
B
C
3161
3886
4615
LSD 889

RESULTS

Growth and Development

Weather played a very important role in the growth, development, and production of spring wheat over the four years of trials. Warm, dry weather conditions in April and May in 2010 and 2012 allowed for early planting at all locations, which supported good early growth, limited weed pressure, and good to excellent yields and overall quality. In 2011, high precipitation levels in early spring led to late planting and resulted in moderate to severe issues with weed pressure, yields, and quality, especially at the Alburgh, VT, and Willsboro, NY sites. In 2013, dry weather from mid-April to mid-May allowed for timely planting at all sites, but extreme moisture conditions starting in mid-May and persisting into early July during the critical early growth stages of wheat led to below-average yields and high DON levels, with the Presque Isle, ME site being the exception.

Flowering generally occurred during the third and fourth week of June in each year, except in 2011 and at the Presque Isle, ME site in 2013 (Table 4). In these cases, later planting delayed flowering. Across all sites and years, Brick, and Roblin were the earliest varieties to flower, whereas AC Walton and Red Fife were among the latest.

Over the four years of trialing, plant heights ranged from 28 to 43 inches (Table 4). AC Walton, Kaffé, Megantic, and Red Fife were the tallest varieties, while Sy Rowyn, Ada, Jenna, and Sy Soren were the shortest.

Lodging was moderate in the first three years with Sabin, Helios lodging in Alburgh, VT in 2011 and Red Fife lodging in Old Town, ME in 2011. In 2013, the VT and NY sites experienced more lodging issues and the varieties that lodged were Red Fife, McKenzie, Megantic, Prosper, Yorkton, Superb, Faller, Kaffé, and Sy Rowyn. At the Sidney, ME site that year, three varieties lodged, Red Fife, Advance, and RB07.

Weed pressure was generally low at the ME sites and did not cause yield or quality problems except at the Sidney location in 2013 where weeds likely contributed to lower yield. Weed pressure was severe at the Alburgh, VT site in 2010 and 2013, and the Willsboro, NY site in 2013. In 2011 and 2013, the NY site also experienced extensive damage from wild turkeys.

Grain Yield

Harvesting plots in Old Town, ME.
Harvesting plots in Old Town, ME. Photo by Ellen Mallory.

A typical yield for organic hard red spring wheat grown in Northern New England is about 2,000 lbs per acre (Matt Williams, personal communication, 2011). Yields over the four years of these trials were variable (Table 5). At the ME sites, the average yield across varieties met or exceeded the regional average in all years except in 2013 in Sidney. In contrast, yields were well below the regional average at the Alburgh, VT site in 2010 and 2011 but exceeded or met this average in 2012 and 2013. In Willsboro, NY yields were equal or above average in 2010 and 2012 but below average in 2011 and 2013. Across all sites and years, Faller, Jenna, Magog, and Tom have been consistently among the highest yielding varieties, whereas AC Barrie and Red Fife have been among the lowest yielding varieties.

Grain Quality

Commercial mills use a variety of measurements to determine if a particular lot of wheat is suitable for bread flour, including grain protein, test weight, falling number, and mycotoxin (DON) concentration.

Grain protein levels varied considerably among years, with all sites producing their highest protein levels in 2010 and most sites experiencing their lowest protein levels in 2011 (Table 6). Site averages ranged from lows of 11.3% and 11.5% at the 2011 Old Town, ME and 2013 Presque Isle ME sites, respectively, to highs of 15.3%, 15.6%, and 15.7% at the 2010 Alburgh, VT, 2010 Willsboro, NY, and 2010 Old Town, ME sites, respectively. Among the varieties, AC Barrie, Glenn, Roblin, and the new variety Yorkton have consistently produced among the highest protein levels over the four years of trialing, whereas Faller, FBC Dylan, and Kaffé have consistently ranked low for grain protein.

The standard test weight for hard red spring wheat is 58 lbs per bushel, with an acceptable range of 56-60 lbs per bushel. Most varieties had adequate to good test weights for the first three years of the trial, although in 2011 test weights were on the lower end of the acceptable range (Table 7). However, in 2013, while most varieties at the Presque Isle, ME site tested above 60 lbs per bushel, most of the varieties at the Sidney, ME and Alburgh, VT locations tested below the acceptable level. (Test weight was not measured at the Willsboro, NY site in 2013.) Varieties that consistently demonstrated relatively high test weights across locations included Barlow, Faller, Glenn, Jenna, Oklee, and Tom, whereas AC Barrie, AC Walton, Red Fife, and Roblin tended to produce low test weights.

Falling number values were well above the acceptable level (250 seconds) in almost all cases. Exceptions include Jenna, Kaffé, and Roblin, which tested below 250 seconds in 2011 and 2013 for at least one site (Table 8). However, these trials are not the best indicator of each variety’s susceptibility to pre-harvest sprouting because of our method of harvesting, which required us to harvest all varieties at the same time and therefore wait to harvest until the latest maturing variety threshed free in hand tests. This may have put early maturing varieties like Roblin at greater risk for pre-harvest sprouting and low falling number values than later maturing varieties.

Fusarium head blight, which produces the mycotoxin deoxynivalenol (DON), is a disease of major concern for wheat growers in northern New England. It primarily infects the plant during flowering and is favored by cool, humid weather. The United States Food and Drug Administration has established a maximum DON guideline of 1 ppm for finished human products. Millers may accept grain with slightly higher DON levels because, through cleaning, they can remove some of the infected grain and reduce DON levels.

DON levels were quite variable among sites and years (see Table 9). In ME, the Old Town and Sidney locations experienced average DON levels above 1 ppm in five of the seven site years, while the 2013 Presque Isle site had very low DON levels with only one variety testing above 1 ppm (Red Fife). At the Alburgh, VT site, average DON levels were above 1 ppm for two of the four years, while at Willsboro, NY DON levels exceeded 1 ppm in only one year (2013). Some varieties were dropped from the trialing program due to unacceptably high DON levels, specifically Batiscan, Cabernet, Kelse, and Malbec. Other varieties that have showed relatively high DON levels include Barlow, Jenna, McKenzie, Steele, Superb, and Ulen. The varieties that have consistently shown the lowest DON levels are AC Barrie, Brick, Glenn, Magog, Tom, and Yorkton.

Baking Quality

loaf of bread
Bread made with spring wheat flour. Photo by Erica Cummings.

The three bakers found that all of the spring wheat samples that they tested had satisfactory to excellent baking characteristics and produced bread loaves that they would be comfortable selling in their bakeries. The varieties tested were Barlow, Faller, Glenn, Magog, McKenzie, RB07, Red Fife, Roblin, Sy Soren, Tom, and Yorkton (Table 10). Glenn and Faller produced the best overall results in this testing, while Red Fife, Tom, and Yorkton were found to have some deficiencies. The samples used for the tests had a range of protein levels from 12.8 to 13.8%. Within this range, the bakers noted that higher protein did not necessarily equate with better baking quality. However, they did remark that these samples of spring wheat had higher overall protein levels and baking performance than winter wheat samples they had trialed in 2012.

DISCUSSION

Wheat grain sold for bread flour can receive up to twice the pay price as grain sold for livestock feed in New England, but the grain must meet higher quality standards. Therefore, when choosing varieties, it is important to consider their potential to produce grain with acceptable protein, test weight, falling number, DON levels, and baking performance, as well as their ability to produce high yields.

There is often a tradeoff between yield potential and protein potential. For instance Faller had impressive yields over the four years of these trials, but also had among the lowest protein levels. In contrast, Roblin, Glenn, and Yorktown produced lower than average yields, but consistently had among the highest protein levels. A number of varieties tested in these trials have produced average or above-average yields and also maintained adequate protein levels. These varieties include Jenna, Oklee, RB07, Superb, and Tom.

Fusarium head blight can be a major issue in our region. Options for managing the disease in organic systems are limited and include rotating with non-grain crops (i.e., avoid planting wheat after wheat, corn, barley, and rye), incorporating any disease-carrying debris into the soil, and choosing less susceptible varieties. While none of the current wheat varieties are fully resistant to Fusarium head blight, some have better tolerance to the disease than others. In variety trials conducted in North Dakota and Minnesota where Fusarium inoculant and moisture levels were controlled to maximize disease incidence, Brick, Forefront, Glenn, and RB07 had the best tolerance to Fusarium when compared to the other varieties. In our trials, varieties that have consistently shown below average DON levels over multiple years include AC Barrie, Brick, Glenn, Magog, Tom, and Yorkton.

Choosing a more tolerant variety may provide some protection against Fusarium, but conditions at flowering drive infection and may still result in high DON levels. One management strategy is to plant multiple varieties that have different maturity dates, and hence flowering dates, to hedge against wet weather at flowering. In these trials Roblin and Brick were consistently early to flower, while AC Walton and Red Fife were the latest.

Although a limited number of varieties and samples were selected for bake testing, the results showed that as long as quality parameters such as protein, DON, falling number, and test weight are adequate, good to excellent artisanal breads can be baked from organic spring wheat grown in Northern New England. “For the most part, these flours were at least as strong as the flours we currently use in our bakery, if not more,” said test baker Alison Pray of Standard Baking Company in Portland ME, “The flavors and textures, given some slight variations between the flours, were widely enjoyed by our staff. I’m confident that we could make great bread using any one of these, with some tweaks in the process.”

It may be helpful to compare these ME, VT, and NY results with results from variety trails conducted in other regions. Ultimately, though, it is important to evaluate data from test sites that are similar to your farm and region when deciding which varieties to grow.

Full reports of the 2010, 2011, and 2012 results are available as separate publications.

Spring wheat plots in Presque Isle, ME. Photo by Ellen Mallory.
Spring wheat plots in Presque Isle, ME. Photo by Ellen Mallory.Photo by Ellen Mallory.

March 11, 2014

Acknowledgements: The UVM Extension Crops and Soils Team would like to thank the Borderview Research Farm and the Willsboro Research Farm for their generous help with the trials, and Katie Blair, Chantel Cline, and Savanna Kittell-Mitchell for their assistance with data collection and entry. The University of Maine Sustainable Agriculture team thanks Jeff Bragg of Rainbow Valley Farm for providing his assistance and field in Sidney, the University of Maine Rogers Research Farm, and Joe Cannon, Chris Illingworth, Maggie Lynn, Jess Richards, Michael Correl, Erin Roche, and Aaron Englander for their technical help.

Information in this publication is provided purely for educational purposes. No responsibility is assumed for any problems associated with the use of products or services mentioned. No endorsement of products or companies is intended, nor is criticism of unnamed products or companies implied.

This research is supported by the U.S. Department of Agriculture, National Institute of Food and Agriculture, Organic Research and Extension Initiative under Award No. 2009-01366, “Enhancing farmers’ capacity to produce high quality organic bread wheat.”

Published and distributed in furtherance of Acts of Congress of May 8 and June 30, 1914, by the University of Maine Cooperative Extension, the Land Grant University of the state of Maine and the U.S. Department of Agriculture cooperating. Cooperative Extension and other agencies of the U.S.D.A. provide equal opportunities in programs and employment. Call 800.287.0271 (in Maine), or 207.581.3188, for information on publications and program offerings from University of Maine Cooperative Extension, or visit extension.umaine.edu.


Table 1. Spring wheat varieties planted in ME, VT, and NY in 2010-2013.

Year Grown
Variety Origin and Year of Release† 2010 2011 2012 2013
AC Barrie AAFC, Saskatchewan, 1994 X X X X
AC Walton AAFC, PEI, 1995 X X X X
Ada MAES, 2006 X X X
Advance SDAES, 2011 X
Barlow NDAES, 2009 X X X X
Batiscan Semican, Canada X X
Brick SDAES, 2000 X X X
Cabernet Resource Seed, PNW, 2001 X X
Faller NDAES, 2007 X X X X
FBC Dylan NPSAS/FBC, 2006 X X X
ForeFront SDAES, 2012 X
Glenn NDAES, 2005 X X X X
Helios AAFC, Saskatchewan, 2007 X X
Howard NDSU, 2006 X X
Jenna Agripro Syngenta, 2009 X X X X
Kaffé§ Semican, Canada X X X
Kelse WSU, 2008 X X
Kingsey Semican, Canada X X
Magog Semican, Canada, 2009 X X X X
Malbec Agripro Syngenta, PNW X X
McKenzie SWP/ARD, 1997 X X X
Megantic SynAgri, 2008 X
Oklee MAES, 2003 X X X
Prosper NDAES & MAES, 2012 X
RB07 MAES, 2007 X X X X
Red Fife Heritage var., ca. 1860 X X X X
Roblin ACRS, Winnipeg, 2001 X X X X
Sabin MAES, 2009 X X X
Steele NDAES, 2004 X X X
Superb AAFC, Winnipeg, 2001 X X X X
Sy Rowyn Agripro Syngenta, 2013 X
Sy Soren Agripro Syngenta, 2011 X X
Tom MAES, 2008 X X X X
Ulen MAES, 2005 X X X
Yorkton# Semican, Canada, 2013 X X X

† Year of release not always available,

‡ Abbreviations: AAFC = Agric. & Agri-Food Canada, ACRS = Agric. Canada Rsrch. Station, FBC = Farmer Breeder Club, MAES = Minnesota Agric. Expt. Station, NDAES = North Dakota Agric. Expt. Station, NDSU = North Dakota State Univ., NPSAS = North Plains Sustainable Agric. Society, PEI = Prince Edward Island, SDAES = South Dakota Agric. Expt. Station, WSU = Washington State University SWP=Saskatchewan Wheat Pool, ARD=Agricultural Research and Development.

§ Soft white.

# Formerly 07SW07

Table 2. Precipitation, temperature, and growing degree days in ME, VT, and NY in 2010-2013.

Site and
Month
Total
Precipitation (in.)
30-Year
Average
Average
Temperature (°F)
30-Year
Average
Growing
Degree Days
2010 2011 2012 2013 1981-2010 2010 2011 2012 2013 1981-2010 2010 2011 2012 2013
Old Town, ME
April 2.3 5.7 3.7 1.4 3.8 46 42 44 40 42 426 294 356 229
May 1.9 3.8 4.3 4.2 3.9 56 54 55 54 53 726 680 707 667
June 4.0 4.2 6.0 6.0 4.1 62 61 61 61 62 857 844 867 855
July 2.2 2.1 1.0 4.4 3.6 71 69 69 69 68 1182 1127 1114 1104
August 1.1 8.8 2.8 6.4 3.3 67 66 69 64 66 1077 1061 1096 1002
Waterville, ME
April 3.1 4.3 3.3 2.1 3.5 48 43 46 42 43 479 340 408 305
May 1.8 4.3 3.5 5.4 3.8 58 55 57 52 54 779 723 766 677
June 4.3 1.8 5.2 4.0 64 63 63 63 64 945 930 924 981
July 2.3 3.6 0.6 4.2 3.6 72 71 72 71 69 1223 1213 1227 1168
August 3.7 6.3 3.7 6.7 3.5 69 69 71 67 68 1133 1134 1202 1088
Alburgh, VT
April 2.6 7.9 2.6 2.1 2.82 40 47 45 44 44.8 331 465 396 348
May 3.9 8.7 3.9 4.8 3.45 45 59 61 59 56.3 396 826 884 848
June 3.2 3.5 3.2 9.2 3.69 61 67 67 64 65.8 884 1088 1046 967
July 3.8 3.7 3.8 1.9 4.16 67 74 71 72 70.6 1046 1314 1221 1235
August 10.2 2.4 3.91 71 70 68 68.8 1221 1121 1112
Willsboro, NY
April 2.8 6.6 2.8 2.1 2.8 46 46 46 45 45 411 423 411 383
May 4.4 7.8 4.4 8.7 3.5 62 58 62 61 56 435 809 435 890
June 3.2 2.8 3.2 9.9 3.7 68 66 68 67 66 917 1064 917 1034
July 3.8 1.8 3.8 4.5 4.2 73 73 73 74 71 1072 1277 1072 1253
August 2.9 5.8 2.9 3.1 3.9 72 70 72 69 69 1271 1181 1271 1161

† Bases on National Weather Service data from cooperative observer stations in close proximity to field trials available at http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/crn/report. Historical averages are for 30 years (1981-2010) available at https://www.climate.gov/maps-data/dataset/1981-2010-climate-normals-data-table.

‡ Monthly averages not available due to missing data points.

# Base 32°F

Table 3. Plot management for the spring wheat variety trials in ME, VT, and NY in 2010-2013.

Trial Location
Old Town or
Presque Isle, ME
Sidney, ME Alburgh, VT Willsboro, NY
Soil type
2010 Suffield silt loam Buxton silt loam Benson rocky silt loam Kingsbury silt clay loam
2011 Buxton silt loam
2012 Stetson fine sandy loam
2013 Caribou gravelly loam
Previous crop
2010 Soybeans Silage corn Grass sod Soybeans
2011 Silage corn High moisture ear corn Winter wheat Timothy/alfalfa sod
2011 Silage corn High moisture ear corn Sunflowers/grass sod Winter wheat
2013 Potato High moisture ear corn Silage corn Winter wheat
Pre-plant fertility source (rates are per acre)
2010 Solid dairy manure Liquid dairy manure Grass sod plow down Soybeans
21 ton 5333 gal
2011 Solid dairy manure Liquid dairy manure Poultry manure (2-3-2) 3-yr Timothy/Alfalfa sod
24 ton 6900 gal 2 ton
2012 Solid dairy manure Solid dairy manure Grass sod plow down 3-yr Timothy/Alfalfa sod
25 ton 20 ton
2013 Chicken manure Solid dairy manure None 3-yr Timothy/Alfalfa sod
3-4 ton 28 ton
Topdress nitrogen (rates are per acre)
2010 None None None None
2011 None None Pro-Gro, 50 lb N None
2012 Chilean nitrate, 16 lb N None None None
2013 None None None None
Planting date
2010 26-Apr 15-Apr 21-Apr 26-Apr
2011 9-May 3-May 2-May 13-May
2012 12-Apr 14-Apr 6-Apr 13-Apr
2013 13-May 2-May 22-Apr 23-Apr
Harvest date
2010 6-Aug 30-Jul 30-Jul 2-Aug
2011 19-Aug 12-Aug 17-Aug 19-Aug
2012 7-Aug 31-Jul 31-Jul 8-Aug
2013 29-Aug 15-Aug 5-Aug 16-Aug

† Trial location was in Presque Isle, ME in 2013

Table 4. Relative flowering time Flowering and plant height of spring wheat grown in ME, VT, and NY in 2010-2013.

Relative
Flowering Date
Plant
Height (in)
AC Barrie Medium 37
AC Walton Late 40
Ada Medium 29
Advance Medium 31
Barlow Medium 34
Brick Early 36
Faller Medium 33
FBC Dylan Medium 33
Forefront Medium 38
Glenn Medium 35
Helios Medium 36
Jenna Medium 29
Kaffé Medium 40
Magog Medium 38
McKenzie Medium 38
Megantic Medium 43
Oklee Medium 31
Prosper Medium 34
RB07 Medium 30
Red Fife Late 43
Roblin Early 36
Sabin Medium 31
Steele Medium 32
Superb Medium 33
Sy Rowyn Medium 29
Sy Soren Medium 28
Tom Medium 32
Ulen Medium 31
Yorkton‡ Medium 36

‡ Formerly 07SW04

Table 5. Yield of spring wheat grown in ME, VT, and NY in 2010-2013.

Yield at 13.5% moisture (lbs/acre)
Old Town or
Presque Isle, ME
Sidney, ME Alburgh, VT Willsboro, NY
2010 2011 2012 2013† Avg. 2010 2011 2012 2013 Avg. 2010 2011 2012 2013 Avg. 2010 2011 2012 2013 Avg.
AC Barrie 2077 2578 3796 2952 2851 1987 2606 2221 956 1943 845 711 3022 1090 1417 1864 736 2755 413 1442
AC Walton 2699 2736 4919 3451 3001 2377 2201 1222 847 3339 2783 2048 2872 534 3669 539 1903
Ada 2098 2917 2508 2382 3030 2706 1011 992 3733 1912 2215 1579 3488 2427
Advance 3857 3857 1553 1553 2046 2046 1322 1322
Barlow 2922 4324 3401 3549 3170 2530 1710 2470 978 3609 1819 2135 1604 3989 1987 2527
Brick 2748 4450 3212 3470 2763 2143 1615 2174 1102 3578 2363 2348 1744 3582 2047 2458
Faller 3575 3221 5086 3427 3827 3260 3653 2166 1878 2739 1580 965 3998 2503 2262 3235 1634 3981 1865 2679
FBC Dylan 2987 2900 4588 3492 2566 2945 2587 2699 1286 796 3168 1750 2202 1101 3227 2177
Forefront 3169 3169 1950 1950 2404 2404 2314 2314
Glenn 2334 2644 3948 3255 3045 2200 2695 1860 1434 2047 1063 730 3260 1474 1632 2001 1863 3864 1413 2285
Helios 1148 1353 3156 1886 2016 1165 3976 2386
Jenna 3338 4781 3848 3989 3355 2861 1602 2606 1168 3865 2341 2458 1437 3453 1547 2146
Kaffé§ 2009 1307 3919 1630 2216 2653 1153 3568 959 2083
Magog 2396 2695 4779 3969 3460 2765 3257 2849 1090 2490 1281 1013 4048 2032 2093 2582 500 3351 677 1777
McKenzie 2218 4135 3177 2508 2127 2318 1146 847 2191 1062 1311 2527 1593 3472 1738 2332
Megantic 1375 1375 1005 1005
Oklee 3353 3134 4361 3616 2943 2771 2291 2668 1130 813 3131 1691 2147 1190 2757 2031
Prosper 4044 4044 1714 1714 1919 1919 2143 2143
RB07 2766 3047 4115 3419 3337 2716 3281 2303 1576 2469 1113 695 3776 2132 1929 2136 1526 3774 1339 2194
Red Fife 2036 2278 3368 2279 2490 1993 2529 2119 1347 1997 1083 788 2604 1057 1383 2325 477 2937 453 1548
Roblin 2523 2289 3921 2495 2807 2071 2793 2065 1600 2132 1097 758 3026 1416 1574 1838 686 3455 954 1733
Sabin 2986 2692 4393 3357 2920 3058 1911 2630 1247 940 2666 1618 2599 863 2882 2115
Steele 2829 2759 4653 3414 2643 3110 1777 2510 1222 749 3367 1779 2183 882 3260 2108
Superb 3168 2650 4440 3419 2807 2996 2190 2664 1297 1226 3658 1661 1961 2429 1536 3363 1129 2114
Sy Rowyn 3762 3762 1824 1824 2563 2563 1693 1693
Sy Soren 3565 3565 1719 1719 4294 2007 3151 3513 1485 2499
Tom 3684 3087 4488 3462 3680 3050 3179 3082 1992 2826 1298 1267 4159 2304 2257 1980 1627 3600 1296 2126
Ulen 2969 2816 4358 3381 2679 2755 2142 2525 1277 900 3755 1977 1916 1532 2817 2088
Yorkton‡ 2560 3963 2755 3093 2502 2140 1224 1955 799 3592 1582 1991 933 3263 482 1559
Site
Average
2780 2773 4343 3366 3316 2599 2950 2287 1580 2354 1229 945 3402 1886 1866 2301 1213 3423 862 1950
LSD (0.05) 453 417 588 730 515 561 661 262 473 359 592 628 352 525 489 1308

†The trial was located in Old Town in 2010-2012 and in Presque Isle in 2013.

‡ Formerly 07SW04

Table 6. Protein concentration of spring wheat grown in ME, VT, and NY in 2010-2013.

Protein at 12% moisture (%)
Old Town or
Presque Isle, ME
Sidney, ME Alburgh, VT Willsboro, NY
2010 2011 2012 2013 Avg. 2010 2011 2012 2013 Avg. 2010 2011 2012 2013 Avg. 2010 2011 2012 2013 Avg.
AC Barrie 16.0 11.6 14.0 11.4 13.2 14.5 13.1 14.3 17.2 14.8 16.8 13.3 15.1 17.1 15.6 16.1 15.3 12.7 16.5 15.2
AC Walton 15.6 10.9 10.8 12.4 11.0 12.1 11.6 15.7 12.3 13.8 14.8 14.2 13.7 15.5 12.1 14.9 14.0
Ada 16.0 11.4 13.7 12.6 13.3 13.0 14.6 12.3 13.0 13.3 15.0 14.2 12.5 13.9
Advance 11.5 11.5 12.0 12.0 14.5 14.5 13.6 13.6
Barlow 11.3 13.0 11.8 12.0 13.5 13.4 14.4 13.8 13.0 14.1 15.3 14.1 15.3 12.9 14.2 14.1
Brick 10.5 13.2 11.6 11.8 12.1 13.0 13.6 12.9 13.8 14.0 14.7 14.2 15.5 12.7 14.9 14.4
Faller 14.9 10.8 10.9 10.6 11.8 12.2 11.0 11.4 12.9 11.9 14.4 11.0 12.9 14.7 13.3 14.4 13.9 11.4 15.4 13.8
FBC Dylan 14.6 10.5 12.3 12.5 11.7 11.2 11.3 11.4 13.8 12.3 13.6 13.2 14.1 13.8 11.4 13.1
Forefront 11.0 11.0 14.0 14.0 14.3 14.3 14.3 14.3
Glenn 16.4 12.0 14.7 11.4 13.6 15.4 13.8 13.8 14.3 14.3 16.0 12.5 14.9 16.4 14.9 17.0 15.6 14.1 14.1 15.2
Helios 16.0 13.8 14.3 14.7 17.3 14.3 12.6 14.7
Jenna 10.9 13.3 12.5 12.2 11.7 13.0 13.1 12.6 13.0 13.9 14.3 13.7 13.9 11.7 14.5 13.4
Kaffé§ 13.7 11.3 12.0 14.3 12.8 14.2 12.9 11.1 14.5 13.2
Magog 15.6 10.5 11.9 9.7 11.9 12.6 12.1 12.7 15.4 13.2 15.9 13.0 13.1 15.1 14.3 14.9 15.0 12.6 15.3 14.5
McKenzie 10.9 12.7 11.8 11.8 12.2 12.0 15.3 11.8 13.1 15.6 13.9 15.3 14.7 11.9 15.1 14.3
Megantic 15.9 15.9 15.7 15.7
Oklee 15.7 11.5 13.7 13.6 12.5 12.6 13.7 12.9 15.6 13.5 14.6 14.6 16.1 14.8 12.9 14.6
Prosper 10.8 10.8 10.6 10.6 14.7 14.7 14.8 14.8
RB07 15.8 11.4 13.4 12.2 13.2 14.3 12.7 13.1 14.3 13.6 15.2 12.5 13.7 14.7 14.0 15.8 14.3 12.3 13.9 14.1
Red Fife 16.4 12.2 11.2 10.4 12.5 14.2 12.4 12.2 12.5 12.8 16.2 12.8 13.6 14.9 14.4 15.3 14.4 12.5 14.3 14.1
Roblin 16.6 12.8 15.3 13.4 14.5 14.8 13.5 13.9 14.9 14.3 16.0 15.0 15.7 15.9 15.7 18.0 15.8 15.1 16.3 16.3
Sabin 15.7 10.9 12.3 13.0 12.0 11.9 12.1 12.0 16.9 13.0 13.6 14.5 14.7 14.5 11.6 13.6
Steele 15.8 11.7 13.7 13.7 13.7 12.6 12.6 13.0 15.2 13.3 13.9 14.1 16.2 15.2 12.4 14.6
Superb 16.0 11.7 13.4 13.7 13.4 13.0 12.6 13.0 15.0 13.5 13.4 16.1 14.5 16.0 14.5 13.0 15.5 14.8
Sy Rowyn 12.1 12.1 12.6 12.6 13.9 13.9 14.6 14.6
Sy Soren 12.4 12.4 14.3 14.3 14.1 15.5 14.8 13.3 15.4 14.3
Tom 14.6 10.7 13.8 10.7 12.5 13.2 13.1 12.7 12.9 13.0 13.6 13.3 14.4 15.0 14.1 15.6 14.7 12.7 13.3 14.1
Ulen 16.0 11.9 14.6 14.2 14.4 13.2 13.5 13.7 15.3 13.0 14.1 14.1 16.7 14.6 12.3 14.5
Yorkton‡ 11.7 14.1 12.0 12.6 13.6 14.7 17.8 15.4 13.3 15.0 16.4 14.9 16.6 14.3 17.1 16.0
Site
Average
15.7 11.3 13.1 11.5 12.9 13.4 12.5 12.9 14.0 13.2 15.3 12.9 13.9 15.0 14.3 15.6 14.8 12.6 15.0 14.5
LSD (0.05) 0.8 0.6 1.0 0.8 1.4 0.8 1.0 1.0 1.3 0.8 1.0 0.8 0.8 0.9

† The trial was located in Old Town in 2010-2012 and in Presque Isle in 2013.

‡ Formerly 07SW04

Table 7. Test weight of spring wheat grown in ME, VT, and NY in 2010-2013.

Test Weight (lbs/bu)
Old Town or
Presque Isle, ME
Sidney, ME Alburgh, VT Willsboro, NY
2010 2011 2012 2013 Average 2010 2011 2012 2013 Average 2010 2011 2012 2013 Average 2010 2011 2012 Average
AC Barrie 57 56 61 60 58 59 58 59 51 57 55 55 61 57 57 55 57 59 57
AC Walton 54 53 60 56 56 54 55 52 55 57 53 54 54 56 57 56
Ada 57 58 58 60 58 59 56 56 62 58 60 57 60 59
Advance 61 61 52 52 57 57
Barlow 58 64 61 61 59 60 55 58 56 61 58 58 57 60 59
Brick 58 63 61 61 59 60 54 58 55 62 57 58 57 59 58
Faller 59 57 62 60 59 59 57 58 53 57 56 55 61 56 57 57 56 58 57
FBC Dylan 59 56 62 59 59 58 59 59 56 56 61 58 57 57 59 58
Forefront 60 60 54 54 57 57
Glenn 60 59 64 61 61 61 59 60 55 59 55 56 64 56 58 59 58 60 59
Helios 55 56 60 57 57 58 58 58
Jenna 55 61 60 59 56 57 51 55 56 61 54 57 57 58 58
Kaffé§ 56 56 60 54 56 58 57 57 57
Magog 56 56 61 60 58 59 57 58 50 56 53 56 61 56 56 54 55 59 56
McKenzie 57 61 59 57 58 58 56 55 61 55 57 58 57 57 57
Megantic 59 59
Oklee 59 58 63 60 60 59 59 59 56 56 61 58 58 57 58 58
Prosper 60 60 53 53 54 54
RB07 56 56 61 61 58 58 57 59 49 56 57 55 60 55 57 58 58 57 58
Red Fife 57 55 60 57 57 56 54 52 55 51 56 61 53 55 50 55 59 55
Roblin 56 54 60 59 57 58 56 58 50 56 51 55 59 55 55 56 57 58 57
Sabin 57 57 61 58 58 58 58 58 55 56 59 57 57 57 57 57
Steele 59 56 62 59 59 58 58 58 56 56 62 58 58 57 58 58
Superb 57 55 60 57 60 57 58 58 53 55 61 55 56 56 57 58 57
Sy Rowyn 61 61 52 52 57 57
Sy Soren 61 61 54 54 62 56 59 59 59
Tom 59 58 62 61 60 60 58 59 54 58 58 56 62 56 58 58 58 59 58
Ulen 57 56 60 58 59 57 58 58 57 55 61 58 57 57 59 58
Yorkton‡ 61 60 60 58 59 52 56 55 61 55 57 57 59 58
Site Average 57 56 61 60 59 59 57 58 52 57 53 55 61 56 56 57 57 58 57
LSD (0.05) 1 0.7 0.5 0.5 1 0.8 1.2 1.4 3.4 NS 0.9 1.9 1.4 1.4 1.3

† The trial was located in Old Town in 2010-2012 and in Presque Isle in 2013.

‡ Formerly 07SW04

Table 8. Falling number of spring wheat grown in ME, VT, and NY in 2010-2013.

Falling Number at 14% Moisture (seconds)
Old Town or
Presque Isle, ME
Sidney, ME Alburgh, VT Willsboro, NY
2010 2011 2012 2011 2012 2010 2011 2012 2013 2010 2011 2012 2013
AC Barrie 464 358 491 417 461 394 379 453 396 461 441 447 339
AC Walton 409 368 444 364 430 357 312 434 361 362 386 431 313
Ada 532 366 419 404 409 464 448 473 481
Advance 275 313
Barlow 261 398 372 371 305 399 261 390 395 322
Brick 326 423 385 437 282 410 326 353 357 343
Faller 413 358 453 371 440 341 332 432 344 358 393 417 333
FBC Dylan 502 306 456 343 486 403 345 479 435 460 476
Forefront 408 314 440 346
Glenn 388 329 422 401 403 334 323 379 282 335 386 393 333
Helios 414 384 485 461 473 465
Jenna 290 472 360 411 232 422 262 401 371 289
Kaffé§ 288 235 374 297 334 233 322 117
Magog 511 388 520 471 520 384 362 464 394 419 432 474 347
McKenzie 360 470 401 442 377 375 421 345 379 412 407 362
Megantic 393 347
Oklee 478 319 474 374 475 362 310 425 408 387 432
Prosper 326 344
RB07 408 330 394 300 421 344 298 401 276 380 398 377 305
Red Fife 392 317 372 333 383 305 300 377 253 327 359 359 251
Roblin 403 210 467 268 434 358 265 389 344 400 381 382 282
Sabin 383 389 458 478 496 351 332 468 428 437 483
Steele 414 293 392 399 423 319 310 410 371 378 408
Superb 440 358 395 400 501 345 343 433 309 398 415 400 320
Sy Rowyn 391 360
Sy Soren 432 318 430 347
Tom 469 374 445 480 449 381 380 450 403 434 445 448 361
Ulen 367 264 295 335 340 288 372 393 317 372 375
Yorkton‡ 391 479 444 500 413 461 392 431 462 343

† The trial was located in Old Town in 2010-2012 and in Presque Isle in 2013.

‡ Formerly 07SW04

Table 9. Levels of the deoxynivalenol mycotoxin (DON) in spring wheat grown in ME, VT, and NY in 2010-2013.

DON (ppm)
Old Town or
Presque Isle†, ME
Sidney, ME Alburgh, VT Willsboro, NY
2010 2011 2012 2013 2010 2011 2012 2013 2010 2011 2012 2013 2010 2011 2012 2013
AC Barrie 0.8 2.2 < < < < 0.5 4.5 3.3 < < 3.7 < < < 1.4
AC Walton 2.6 1.7 1.4 < 1.5 2.1 < < 5.5 < < < 1.4
Ada 1.6 4.1 0.6 1.0 3.3 < < 0.8 < <
Advance < 4.7 5.2 1.9
Barlow 3.4 1.0 < 1.5 1.1 5.0 < 0.6 5.0 < < 2.0
Brick 1.8 0.6 < 0.7 < 3.6 < < 6.2 < < 2.0
Faller 1.0 1.8 0.5 < 0.6 0.5 0.6 7.0 2.3 < < 3.6 0.7 < < 1.8
FBC Dylan 0.5 4.1 0.7 < 0.6 0.6 2.8 < 0.6 0.6 < <
Forefront < 4.2 4.2 1.5
Glenn < 1.8 0.7 < < 0.6 0.8 4.1 2.0 < < 6.1 0.6 < 0.6 1.4
Helios 2.3 < < 0.6 < <
Jenna 4.2 1.6 0.8 1.0 4.0 3.4 < < 6.0 < < 2.6
Kaffé§ 4.1 < < 8.0 * < < 2.7
Magog 1.3 1.7 0.7 < 0.5 < 1.0 5.0 3.1 < < 4.9 * < < 1.0
McKenzie 1.5 1.5 < 1.9 2.2 < < 4.0 0.5 < < 1.9
Megantic 2.8 1.5
Oklee 1.0 4.1 1.1 < 0.8 0.9 3.8 0.5 0.7 0.9 < <
Prosper < 2.8 5.2 1.8
RB07 0.8 3.6 0.7 < 0.6 0.7 0.5 7.4 2.4 < 0.6 3.6 0.6 < 0.5 1.3
Red Fife < 1.5 1.5 5.3 < 1.1 1.5 4.5 2.1 < < 4.1 * < < 1.6
Roblin 0.7 3.8 0.5 < < 0.8 0.5 6.5 2.3 0.6 0.5 8.5 * < < 4.1
Sabin < 1.1 < < 0.5 < 1.6 < < * < <
Steele 1.2 3.9 1.5 0.5 1.1 2.7 3.4 < 0.6 1.3 < <
Superb 1.9 5.1 4.2 0.7 2.0 2.6 4.9 < 0.7 7.0 2.1 < < 2.4
Sy Rowyn < 2.2 3.2 1.2
Sy Soren < 3.7 < 4.9 < 1.3
Tom 1.2 2.4 0.7 < < < 0.7 4.8 1.7 < < 4.1 0.8 < < 1.3
Ulen 2.5 4.4 1.7 0.5 0.9 2.1 3.1 < 0.7 0.7 < <
Yorkton‡ 1.3 0.5 < < < 3.5 < < 3.8 < < 0.9
Site Average 1.1 2.8 1.1 0.5 < 0.8 1.2 4.5 2.8 < < 5.0 0.7 < < 1.8

† The trial was located in Old Town in 2010-2012 and in Presque Isle in 2013.

‡ Formerly 07SW04

< = < 0.05

Table 10. Bake test results for select spring wheat varieties grown in ME, VT, and NY in 2012.

Flour quality characteristics
Variety Protein Test wt Falling Number Baking Performance
(%) (lbs/bu) (seconds) (Notes from test bakers)
Barlow 13.0 64 398 Great bread
BR07 13.4 61 394 Great bread
Faller 12.9 61 432 Strong, excellent volume, great flavor
Glenn 14.8 64 422 Excellent volume, great crumb
Magog 13.1 61 464 Excellent crumb and volume, good flavor
McKenzie 13.1 61 421 Good flavor, not great crumb
RB07 13.4 61 394 Great bread
Red Fife 13.6 61 377 Slightly lower volume, less than perfect texture
Roblin 15.3 60 467 Great bread
Sy Soren 14.1 62 432 Not great crumb and flavor
Tom 13.8 62 445 Low volume, overly extensible as dough
Yorkton 14.1 62 479 Slightly lower volume, good flavor

† 12% moisture


University of Maine; University of Vermont Extension, Cultivating Healthy Communities