Request for Applications (RFA)

Understanding, Remediating, and Reducing Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) Contamination Related to Food Systems

Background

The University of Maine Cooperative Extension has received a $3 million congressionally directed spending (CDS) grant funded by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). UMaine Extension will distribute these funds to support research that advances the understanding and remediation of PFAS contamination within or related to food systems and in the natural and built environment. Project outcomes will lead to strategies and management decisions that support impacted farmers and citizens, and by extension protect and improve Maine’s economy. Projects must have outcomes that relate to food systems. The research areas include, but are not limited to:

  • Water, aquatic animals and plants;
  • Human food, agricultural and natural systems affected by PFAS contamination;
  • Identifying sources of contamination (e.g. in products or accidental releases); PFAS pollution prevention (e.g. evaluating use of PFAS-free products or processes); and
  • Improved detection and remediation of PFAS chemicals.

This RFA is also aligned with, but not limited to, research needs proposed by the Maine Department of Agriculture, Conservation, and Forestry (DACF) PFAS Fund:

  • PFAS in Agricultural Settings: Water, Soil, and Plant Studies
  • PFAS in Agricultural Settings: Animals and Animal Product Studies
  • Understanding and Managing PFAS in On-Farm Agricultural Settings and Products
  • Remediation of PFAS-Contaminated Land and Suitable Uses of PFAS-Contaminated Agricultural Land and Products

For questions regarding proposal development or submission, please contact Lindsey Pollard by email, lindsey.pollard@maine.edu or phone 207.581.3182.



Award Information

  • Total funding available: $1,613,280 to fund proposals between $50,000 – $250,000
  • Project timeline
    • Earliest project start date is February 15, 2025
    • Final reports due by September 30, 2027
  • All proposals must meet the terms and conditions of EPA Funding
  • Quality Assurance Project Plan (QAPP): All awardees must prepare a QAPP after notification of award in accordance with the most current version of EPA’s Quality Assurance Project Plan (QAPP) Standard. The awardee will be responsible for sending the QAPP to EPA. Specific submission instructions will be shared with awardees at the time they are notified of their award. EPA must approve the QAPP before awardees may draw funds.

Timeline: Fall 2024 Committee Review and Funding

Note that applicants will not use the UMaine Office of Research Assistance’s (ORA) proposal timeline or Proposal Approval Routing System (PARS) for proposal preparation or submission.

  • Pre-proposal due: October 31, 2024
  • Applicants will receive feedback on pre-proposals within 10 days
  • Proposals due: November 29, 2024
  • Notify awardees: December 18, 2024
  • Awardee sends QAPP to EPA as soon as possible. EPA must approve QAPPs before awardees may draw funds. Applicants are responsible for sending QAPPs to EPA (see instructions below).
  • Anticipated contract award date: Late January/ early February
  • Pre-proposals will be accepted after the first round of awards have been announced until December 31, 2025, pending remaining funds. 2025 submission dates to be determined.

Pre-Proposal Components

The pre-proposal will summarize the applicant’s proposed project, including how evaluation parameters will be considered, and an approximate budget with justification. The UMaine grant staff will evaluate pre-proposals for alignment with evaluation criteria and offer feedback to applicants. Please note that the submission of a pre-proposal is mandatory. Projects which have not completed a pre-proposal but still submit a full proposal will not be reviewed.


Project Title

Project Summary

  • The summary will describe the proposed project, subject or area of interest, and how it will address PFAS contamination in Maine (300 word limit).

Names and contact information (email and phone number) for the principal investigator (PI) and Co-PIs.

  • PI must be a UMaine employee. PIs may partner with Co-PIs within the UMaine System or external organizations as contractors.

Approximate budget total and justification.

Refer to UMaine’s Budget Justification Template (PDF) for an example justification.

  • Total direct funds may sum to between $50,000-$250,000
  • Indirect funds have already been deducted from the grant and do not need to be budgeted for individual proposals
  • What do you plan to support with these funds? Include a basic component breakdown. For example, Master’s student $X, sample analysis $X and equipment $X and miscellaneous research supplies $X.
  • Capital assets equipment costs – including fabrication (i.e. anything over $5k)
    • Please refer to the UMaine general accounting for capital assets guidelines
    • Equipment requests over $75k will need approval prior to full proposal submission. Include vendor quotes during proposal submission if available.
  • Travel expenses based on current university rates (see UMaine guidance for more information).

Submission Instructions

Please Note: To access the Pre-Proposal Submission Form (Google Form), a UMS (maine.edu) user account is required.

  • Please fill out the pre-proposal form to submit the components described above. The form includes space to write or copy and paste text.

Pre-Proposal Submission Form (Google Form)

  • Upload any applicable equipment quotes if available in the Appendices section of the form.

For questions, please contact Lindsey Pollard by email, lindsey.pollard@maine.edu or phone 207.581.3182.


Proposal Components

Format requirements

  • Please organize your proposal using the section titles described below, including in the Project Scope.
  • Proposal text will be 12 point and Times New Roman font; single-spaced; and have 1-inch page margins.
  • The Project Scope is limited to three pages.
  • Use the ORA Budget Template Excel file to create your budget (upload budget into the submission form in this file format).

Project Title

Names of the PI, Co-PI, and Collaborators

  • PI must be a UMaine employee. Co-PIs may be part the UMaine System or external organizations.
  • A PI or Co-PI may be written into a maximum of two proposals

Proposed start and end dates of the project

  • Earliest start date: February 2025
  • Latest end date/final report due by: September 30, 2027

Project abstract (200-word limit)

Introduction

  • A brief overview of the project and objectives
  • Explain the need for the proposed research and how the project will address PFAS contamination

Project Scope (three-page limit, not including references)

The project must enhance the understanding of impacts or sources of PFAS contamination and/or remediation that can support strategy and management decisions to benefit farmers, citizens, and the Maine economy. Include a detailed description of the area(s) affected by PFAS contamination (e.g. agriculture, crops, animals, wildlife, remediation, etc.) and the implications on food systems, specific contaminants of concern (e.g. total PFAS, legacy chemicals such as PFOS/ PFOA, other target PFAS, etc.), and desired outcomes and goals of the project. Projects must have outcomes that relate to food systems.

We will use the evaluation parameters listed below to identify research proposals that have the greatest potential to advance understanding of PFAS contamination, inform decision-making, and benefit farmers, citizens, and the economy of Maine.

Describe how the proposed project will consider the criteria listed below. Please organize your project scope into the following sections:

  • Relevance to PFAS Contamination in Maine:
    Address how this research fills critical gaps in understanding PFAS contamination in various environmental matrices (water, soil, air, etc.), its impact on agricultural and food systems, human health, aquatic ecosystems, and the overall economy of Maine. The review committee will give preference to projects that align with the following research needs proposed by the Maine DACF PFAS Fund:
    • PFAS in Agricultural Settings: Water, Soil, and Plant Studies
    • PFAS in Agricultural Settings: Animals and Animal Product Studies
    • Understanding and Managing PFAS in On-Farm Agricultural Settings and Products
    • Remediation of PFAS-Contaminated Land and Suitable Uses of PFAS-Contaminated Agricultural Land and Products

      If research will address other state, federal, or community priorities, include an explanation in the project scope.
  • Potential Impact:
    What are the measurable impacts and outcomes of the research on informing decision-making processes related to PFAS management strategies, exposure or risk assessment, contamination prevention, and remediation efforts? Projects must focus on enhancing the understanding of impacts or sources of PFAS contamination and/or remediation.

    Applicants are encouraged to consider PFAS contamination prevention, but it is not required. Proposals addressing two or more of these elements will be prioritized.
  • External Partner/Community Engagement:
    Describe the involvement of or meaningful engagement with external partners and/or the community. For example, engagement with stakeholders, including farmers, local communities, regulatory agencies, and business and industry partners.
  • Interdisciplinary Approach:
    Proposals are encouraged to adopt an interdisciplinary approach.
  • Innovation and Novelty:
    Address how this research is innovative and novel.
  • Sustainability and Future Funding:
    Examine how the research will provide solutions and how this research will lead to future proposals and funding sources. This can include proposals in process.
  • Dissemination, Knowledge Transfer and Outreach:
    Describe your plans for disseminating research findings, sharing data, and engaging with relevant external partners and communities to facilitate knowledge transfer and ensure that research outcomes are accessible and actionable for decision-makers, practitioners, and the broader community.

Budget Justification

  • Note that applicants will not use PARS for proposal preparation or submission. However, applicants will use ORA’s guidance and templates to demonstrate a budget.
  • Use the ORA Budget Template (Excel) to complete your budget
    • Please ensure to review UMaine’s budget guidance documents:
      • Guide to Budget Preparation (PDF)
      • ORA’s Proposal Toolkit
      • Please ensure the total direct cost does not exceed $250,000 (Row 53, Column I).
        • Note that the budget template will automatically calculate indirect costs for use by ORA. However, indirect funds have already been deducted from the larger grant and will not be deducted for individual projects.
  • Allowable Budget Categories
    • In general, please refer to the ORA Budget Justification Template (PDF)
    • PFAS analysis per sample (no group rate available; the PFAS Analytical and Detection Center should be operational by mid-summer 2025)
    • Summer salary (one week per year) and associated fringe benefits
    • Salary offset for up to one month per year plus associated fringe benefits
    • Graduate student funding
      • The EPA terms and conditions state that “EPA funds for this program may only be used for participant support cost payments, scholarships, tuition remission and other forms of student aid for citizens of the United States, its territories, or possessions, or for individuals lawfully admitted to the United States for permanent residence.”
  • Capital Assets equipment costs (refer to the UMaine Guidelines for general accounting for capital assets)
    • Fabrication allowed
    • Equipment over $75k will need approval prior to full proposal submission
    • Please obtain and submit current quotes for equipment as appendices
  • Funds for collaboration with external partners may be budgeted as subawards. If the collaborator will also analyze samples, you may combine sample analysis costs with other collaboration costs into one subaward.
    • Include a Subrecipient Commitment Form (PDF) and a budget from the partner institution in your proposal packet.
    • Subrecipient’s Indirect Cost Rate. EPA’s subaward policy guidance (PDF) includes the following information on subrecipient indirect costs: “The indirect cost rate [for a subrecipient] may be a rate negotiated and approved by the subrecipient’s cognizant Federal agency. If the subrecipient does not have a Federal indirect cost rate, the pass-through entity may negotiate an indirect cost rate with the subrecipient that complies with 2 CFR Part 200, Subpart E or use the 10% de-minimis indirect cost rate described at 2 CFR 200.414(f).
  • Goods and professional services/ contracts (i.e. sample analyses) will also be allowed without a limit, though if over $10K, it will become a competitive procurement process.

Project Timeline

  • Describe the expected timeline for completion of proposal objectives. Include a Gantt Chart.

Contact Information:

  • Name, title, and contact information (email and phone number) of the point of contact for the proposal.

Appendices

  • Please attach any additional relevant information or supporting documents (e.g. equipment quotes).

Proposal Submission

Submit proposals using the Proposal Submission form:

  • Follow instructions within the form to upload the proposal as a PDF, and budget as an Excel file.
  • Additional documentation, such as equipment estimates, can be uploaded in the “Additional Information” section of the form.

For questions regarding proposal development or submission, please contact Lindsey Pollard by email, lindsey.pollard@maine.edu or phone 207.581.3182.


Evaluation

Evaluation Committee

The evaluation committee will consist of a core group (unless there is a direct conflict of interest):

  • Lindsey Pollard, PFAS Research Coordinator, University of Maine Cooperative Extension
  • Jason Bolton, Ph.D., Associate Dean and Program Leader for Food and Nutrition, University of Maine Cooperative Extension
  • Beth Valentine, Maine Department of Agriculture, Conservation, and Forestry (DACF)
  • Maddy Bruno, Maine Department of Agriculture, Conservation, and Forestry (DACF)

Evaluation Criteria (100 Points system)

Relevance to PFAS Contamination in Maine:

Evaluate the extent to which the research addresses critical gaps in understanding PFAS contamination in various environmental matrices (e.g. water, soil, air, food), its impact on agricultural systems, human health, aquatic ecosystems, other natural systems, and the overall economy of Maine.

15 points

5 points will be automatically awarded to proposals that address a DACF PFAS Fund research need:

  • PFAS in Agricultural Settings: Water, Soil, and Plant Studies
  • PFAS in Agricultural Settings: Animals and Animal Product Studies
  • Understanding and Managing PFAS in On-Farm Agricultural Settings and Products
  • Remediation of PFAS-Contaminated Land and Suitable Uses of PFAS-Contaminated Agricultural Land and Products

External Partner/Community Engagement:

Evaluate the extent to which the research proposal involves meaningful engagement with stakeholders, including farmers, local communities, regulatory agencies, businesses and industry partners. Consider how stakeholder input is integrated into the research design and how the proposed outcomes are relevant and useful to the target audience.

15 points

Potential Impact:

Consider the potential impact of the research outcomes on informing decision-making processes related to PFAS management strategies, risk assessment, and remediation efforts. Assess how the proposed research could contribute to the understanding or reduction of PFAS contamination risks and protect the health and well-being of farmers, citizens, and the environment in Maine.

20 points

  • Proposals must address understanding impacts (including fate and transport) or sources of PFAS contamination and/or remediation
  • Prevention of contamination is encouraged but not required
  • Proposals addressing two or more of these elements will be prioritized

Interdisciplinary Approach:

Encourage proposals that adopt an interdisciplinary approach, integrating expertise from diverse fields such as environmental science, chemistry, toxicology, agriculture, economics, and public health to comprehensively address the complex nature of PFAS contamination and its implications.

5 points

Innovation and Novelty:

Assess the degree of innovation and novelty in the proposed research approach, including the use of emerging technologies, novel analytical methods, or innovative remediation strategies to address PFAS contamination challenges effectively.

5 points

Sustainability and Future Funding:

Evaluate the sustainability of proposed solutions and the potential for this research to lead to future proposals and funding sources.

10 points

Dissemination and Knowledge Transfer:

Assess the proposed plans for developing usable tools, disseminating research findings, sharing data, and engaging with relevant external partners and communities to facilitate knowledge transfer and ensure that research outcomes are accessible and actionable for decision-makers, practitioners, and the broader community.

20 points

Budget:

Review the budget allocation and justification to ensure that resources are appropriately allocated to support the proposed research activities, including personnel, equipment, supplies, and outreach efforts, and that the budget aligns with the proposed scope and objectives of the project.

10 points


Advisory Committee

Earth, Life and Health (ELH)

  • Caroline Noblet
  • Chris Gerbi
  • Alternate: Rachel Schattman

Engineering

  • Onur Apul
  • Sharmila Mukhopadhyay
  • Alternates: Tom Schwartz and Caitlin Howell

College of Liberal Arts and Sciences (CLAS)

  • Matt Brichacek
  • Barbara Cole

UMaine Extension

  • Ellen Mallory – UMaine Extension and Earth, Life and Health 
  • Alternate: Caragh Fitzgerald

This CDS project was generously supported by Senator Susan Collins and Senator Angus King. 

  • Funding agency: Environmental Protection Agency
  • Award number: EM84067201-0

  • PI: Jason Bolton, Ph.D., Associate Dean and Program Leader for Food and Nutrition, University of Maine Cooperative Extension
  • Co-PI: Dean Hannah Carter, Associate Provost for Online and Continuing Education, Dean of UMaine Cooperative Extension
  • Grant Manager: Lindsey Pollard, PFAS Research Coordinator, University of Maine Cooperative Extension